You're right, there's no specific exception in the NEC to 240.24(A) that explicitly permits mounting overcurrent protection devices (OCPDs) at 10' AFG simply because it's a sports lighting pole. You've also correctly identified that 225.32 Exception No. 3 only addresses the location of the disconnecting means, not the OCPD.Here's a breakdown of why this is a tricky situation, and some potential paths you might consider

The Problem: Readily Accessible vs. Practicality
240.24(A)

"Overcurrent devices shall be readily accessible and shall be installed so that the center of the grip of the operating handle of the switch or circuit breaker, when in its highest position, shall not be more than 6 ft 7 in. (2.0 m) above the floor or working platform, unless one of the following applies..." The following don't apply to this situation.

Readily Accessible (Article 100)

Defined as "Capable of being reached quickly for operation, renewal, or inspections without requiring those to whom ready access is requisite to climb over or remove obstacles or to resort to portable ladders, chairs, etc."Mounting at 10' AFG clearly violates 240.24(A) because a portable ladder is required to access it. The code is concerned with safety and ease of maintenance.

Possible Approaches (None are guaranteed, and require AHJ approval)


Seek an Official Interpretation (NEC Panel Interpretation)

This is the most definitive but also the slowest approach. You could formally request an interpretation from the NEC code-making panel. Explain the practicality issues of mounting at a lower height on a sports lighting pole, emphasizing safety (e.g., potential for damage, tampering at lower heights). The interpretation will only pertain to the specific case submitted and would be published.2.

Work with the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)

This is the most common and practical route. Present your case to the local electrical inspector. Highlight:

Safety Justification

Explain why the higher mounting height is safer in this specific application. Vandalism, accidental damage from field activities (e.g., lawnmowers), and unauthorized access are common arguments.

Maintainability

Explain how maintenance will be performed and the equipment required (e.g., bucket truck readily available).

Specific Equipment

If the enclosure is weatherproof and designed for outdoor pole mounting, emphasize this.

Alternatives (Show you've considered them)

Could you use a fused disconnect instead of a breaker? Sometimes a fusible disconnect allows for a more robust, less frequently accessed device. Could you relocate the tap and OCPD to the base of the pole inside a secure, locked enclosure? This is often the best option.3.

Request a Formal Variance/Waiver

Some jurisdictions have a formal process for requesting a variance from the NEC. This requires a documented justification and is subject to AHJ approval.4.

Alternative Design (Least Desirable but Most Compliant)



Move the OCPD

The most compliant solution is to move the OCPD to a location that does meet 240.24(A). This might mean a panelboard located indoors or a ground-mounted enclosure adjacent to the pole.

Remote Operation

This might be possible with a remote-controlled breaker, but there are a lot of practical and safety implications.

Important Considerations When Talking to the AHJ



Documentation

Be prepared to present a detailed drawing, specification sheets for the equipment, and a clear justification.

Professionalism

Approach the AHJ with respect and a willingness to work towards a safe and compliant solution.*

Be Prepared to Compromise

The AHJ may not agree with your initial proposal, but they may suggest alternatives.

In summary, there is no direct NEC exception to allow for the 10' AFG mounting height for the OCPD. You need to engage with the AHJ, provide a strong safety justification, and be open to alternative solutions.

Good luck with your project! Flag for review