Mike Dolt Enterprises Logo Mike Dolt Enterprises

Topic: Arcing and Sparking from Objectionable Current VS Fault Current

User: Cindysparky, Location: Milwaukee

Asked on: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 7:09 pm EST
Answered on: Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 8:15 am EST

Question: Okay, so I have one of Mike Holt’s video set. He said something that really got me wondering.Let me set the scene.In his 2017 video series on Understanding the Code (Art 502 in Hazardous location) he goes on this long winded talk about objectionable current. Objectionable current is an issue in hazardous locations because of arching and sparking. So, that’s why bonding bushings and bonding jumpers are required. It helps prevent possible issues with loose locknuts if there’s objectionable current. (Objectionable current comes about when the neutral and the equipment grounding conductor are tied together in a location other than the service or the secondary side of transformer)Please help me sort out what you read below:He said very casually that fault current is less of an issue with causing arching and sparking with loose locknuts. He said this was because of the amount of amperage at the time of the fault. Could be like 2000Amps.But he said objectionable current was a bigger issue. A loose connection with less current is a bigger issue with arching.What I gathered from this was that fault current would make a very strong connection back to the source regardless of the loose locknuts. Which would cause less of an arch and less spark. Whereas the objectionable current would be in normal current ranges (lets say 20 amps) and pose a bigger risk of igniting. I don’t really understand this. Any input on this topic would be greatly appreciated

You've highlighted a very interesting and potentially counterintuitive point that Mike Holt makes. Let's break down why he might say that objectionable current is a greater sparking risk than high fault current in the context of loose connections in hazardous locations.Here's the core idea: It's not JUST the amount of current, it's the DURATION and STABILITY of the arc that matters.Fault Current Scenario (High Amperage, Short Duration)



High Magnitude

When a fault occurs (e.g., a line conductor touches a metal enclosure), a massive current surge happens VERY quickly. Think 100s to 1000s of amps, depending on the available fault current and system impedance.


Rapid Clearing

Protective devices like circuit breakers or fuses are designed to rapidly interrupt this fault current. This interruption happens in milliseconds.

Potential for Initial Arc, But Fast Extinction

Yes, the initial connection might produce a significant arc due to the high current trying to jump the gap of the loose locknut. However, the

extremely short duration
of the fault current is a key factor. The arc is quenched almost immediately by the rapid tripping of the overcurrent protection device. The heat generated in those milliseconds might not be enough to consistently ignite flammable vapors or dusts. Solid Welding

As Mike Holt mentioned, the sheer magnitude of the fault current can sometimes "weld" or fuse the loose connection together, creating a more solid (albeit temporary) path back to the source, reducing further arcing. This is a less likely scenario, but a possibility.

Objectionable Current Scenario (Lower Amperage, Longer Duration)



Lower Magnitude

Objectionable current is typically within the normal circuit current range, often a few amps to tens of amps.


Persistent Flow

Objectionable current is continuous. It flows whenever the circuit is energized because there's an alternate path for neutral current returning through the equipment grounding conductor.

Sustained Arcing

A loose connection in the path of objectionable current creates a

persistent, but weak arc.
Because the current is relatively low, it doesn't weld the connection together. Instead, it produces a flickering, unstable arc that lasts for a significant time (hours, days, weeks...) as long as the circuit is energized. Ignition Risk

This low-level, sustained arcing is potentially MUCH MORE DANGEROUS. The constant heat generated by the arc, even though it's small, has ample time to ignite flammable vapors or dusts that may accumulate around the loose connection.

Hidden Danger

Because objectionable current is lower in magnitude, it might not be immediately obvious or trip a breaker. It can persist for long periods of time, creating a constant ignition source.

Analogy

Think of it like this:


Fault Current

A firecracker. A brief, intense flash and bang.

Objectionable Current

A constantly sparking, smoldering cigarette butt.The firecracker might be louder, but the cigarette butt has a far higher probability of starting a slow-burning, destructive fire.

Why Hazardous Locations Are Different

In ordinary locations, a brief arc from a fault might cause annoyance or minor damage. But in hazardous locations, the presence of flammable materials amplifies the risk. The sustained arcing from objectionable current creates a constant ignition source, which is a significant hazard.

Key Takeaways

While fault current is certainly dangerous, the combination of

lower current
and longer duration makes objectionable current a greater ignition hazard in hazardous locations. Bonding bushings and jumpers are crucial to ensure a low-impedance path for fault current and to minimize the flow of objectionable current through potentially loose connections. Proper grounding and bonding practices are essential to prevent both types of current from creating hazardous arcs and sparks.

Important Note: This explanation is based on my understanding of electrical principles and common safety practices. Always consult the NEC, relevant industry standards, and qualified professionals for specific applications and installations. Flag for review

Previous Question Next Question