User: highpowered, Location: los angeles
Asked on: Monday, February 10, 2025 at 3:44 pm EST
Answered on: Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 8:28 am EST
Question: I am confused about this section of the code. How do I "prove" That my downstream circuit breakers that are part of the series combination remain passive during the interruption period of the line side fully rated current limiting device? Is this done through fault current calculations? I've never been asked to prove this before. I am assuming I must submit my details from siemens on the breakers I'm installing. Plus submit Fault current calculations. They are also requiring I make placards stating the Catalog numbers of all breakers. My system is as follows:Utility stated AIC= 42,000Single phase system 400A 120/240V EMT 2" 4/0 Parallel conductors (3) per pipe 28' length. terminates to 400A 85KAIC Siemens 3VA53 Molded case breaker.Downstream to power mod 16 units + 1 house panel. 60A 65 KAIC 2 pole breakers at meters. Siemens Q260HHTo the units shortest distance is 40' longest 175'. Main lug panels the breakers there are 10,000AIC. EMT flex combination.Thanks in advanceJason
Okay, Jason, let's break down this unusual request for proving downstream circuit breaker passivity during an interruption period. It's not a common requirement, but let's address how to handle it. Your understanding about fault current calculations and component specifications is correct.
Understanding the Concern & Your System
The requirement to "prove" downstream breaker passivity stems from a few possible concerns, all related to the series combination and the coordination between the breakers. Essentially, they want to be sure that:1. The upstream breaker (the 400A 85kAIC Siemens 3VA53) reliably clears the fault BEFORE the downstream breakers (the 60A 65kAIC Siemens Q260HH) even think about tripping. The goal is for the 400A breaker to handle the full fault current and protect the downstream breakers.2. The downstream breakers are not damaged or stressed beyond their ratings during the fault clearing process by the upstream breaker. Although they don't trip, they still experience the high current for a short period.
How to "Prove" Passivity
You'll need a combination of methods to demonstrate this:1. Fault Current Calculations (Most Important): Calculate the Fault Current at Each Downstream Breaker
You need to calculate the available fault current at each of the 16 meter locations and at the house panel. This is where your cable lengths (40' to 175') and conductor characteristics become crucial. The longer the run, the greater the impedance, and the lower the fault current. Here's how to approach the calculations:
Source Impedance
The utility provided AIC of 42,000A at 240V is your starting point. Convert this to source impedance using: `Z_source = Voltage / (AIC √3)` (the √3 is only for 3-phase systems, so omit it for single-phase). So: `Z_source = 240V / 42000A = 0.0057 ohms`. This is the impedance of the utility feed.
Calculate Conductor Impedance
Calculate the impedance of the 4/0 parallel conductors in the 2" EMT. You'll need to consider:
Conductor Resistance
Look up the AC resistance of 4/0 copper conductors in parallel in a single conduit at the operating temperature you expect (75°C or 90°C). Use the values in Chapter 9, Table 9 of the NEC or from conductor manufacturers' data sheets. Multiply this resistance value per foot by the length of the run (28' to the 400A breaker).
Conductor Reactance
Look up the inductive reactance (Xl) of 4/0 copper conductors in parallel in a single conduit. This is also found in the NEC tables (Chapter 9) or manufacturer's data. Multiply this reactance value per foot by the length of the run (28').
Calculate the impedance
Z = sqrt(R^2 + X^2)
Calculate Downstream Conductor Impedance
Do the same calculations above, using the different lengths of conductors to each load.
Calculate Total Impedance
Add the source impedance (Z_source), the impedance of the 28' 4/0 conductors, and the impedance of each downstream branch circuit to determine the total impedance for each fault location. This will be slightly different for each of the meter locations and the house panel because of the different lengths.
Calculate Fault Current
Divide the voltage (120V or 240V, depending on the fault) by the total impedance for each location to determine the prospective fault current at each downstream breaker. `Fault Current = Voltage / Total Impedance`.
Worst-Case Scenario
Pay close attention to the shortest run to a meter location (40'). This will have the highest fault current. The longest run to a meter location (175') will have the lowest fault current. The house panel will have its own fault current based on the circuit length.
Document Assumptions
Clearly state all assumptions used in your calculations (conductor temperature, conductor type, conduit type, etc.).2.
Time-Current Coordination Study (TCC)
Siemens Provides Curves
Obtain the time-current curves (TCC curves) for the Siemens 3VA53 400A breaker and the Siemens Q260HH 60A breakers. Siemens usually provides these in their technical data sheets or on their website.
Plot the Curves
Plot these curves on the same graph. Ensure the 400A breaker's curve is below and to the left of the 60A breakers' curves for all fault current levels. This graphically shows that the 400A breaker will trip faster than the 60A breakers under fault conditions.
Highlight the Clearing Time
Determine the maximum clearing time of the 400A breaker at the highest fault current calculated at any downstream breaker location. Note: You should also include the time it takes to clear the arc.3.
Siemens Breaker Specifications and Short-Circuit Withstand Ratings
Manufacturer Data
Collect the official data sheets from Siemens for both the 3VA53 and the Q260HH breakers.
Short-Circuit Withstand
Specifically, look for the `I²t` (Ampere-squared seconds) withstand rating of the Q260HH breakers. This rating indicates the amount of energy the breaker can handle without damage during a fault.
Compare
From the TCC curve of the 3VA53 breaker, determine the `I²t` value (energy let-through) at the highest calculated fault current. This `I²t` value must be lower than the `I²t` withstand rating of the Q260HH breakers. This proves the downstream breakers can survive the fault clearing process without damage, even if they don't trip.4.
Engineering Justification Report Summarize
Compile a short report summarizing your findings:
Fault Current Results
State the calculated fault currents at each location.
TCC Analysis
Explain how the TCC curves demonstrate selective coordination.
Withstand Rating
Prove that the `I²t` let-through of the 400A breaker is less than the `I²t` withstand rating of the 60A breakers.
Conclusion
State that based on your calculations and analysis, the downstream 60A breakers will remain passive during the interruption period of the upstream 400A breaker, and will not be damaged by the fault.
Placards
The requirement for placards is straightforward. Create durable labels (e.g., laminated or engraved) and attach them to the enclosure containing the main breaker and any relevant distribution panels. The placards should clearly state: "SERIES RATED SYSTEM" (In bold and prominent letters) Upstream Breaker Catalog Number
"Main Breaker: Siemens 3VA53"
Downstream Breaker Catalog Number
"Downstream Breakers: Siemens Q260HH"
AIC Rating
"Series Combination Rating: [Insert the series rating here – likely equal to the AIC rating of the upstream breaker]"
Example Report Snippet"Based on fault current calculations, the maximum available fault current at any downstream 60A breaker location is [X] kA. The time-current curves for the Siemens 3VA53 and Q260HH breakers demonstrate selective coordination, with the 3VA53 clearing faults within [Y] seconds. The I²t let-through energy of the 3VA53 at [X] kA is [Z] A²s, which is below the I²t withstand rating of [A] A²s for the Siemens Q260HH breakers. Therefore, the downstream breakers will remain passive during fault clearing and will not be damaged."Important Considerations
Software
Using electrical engineering software (e.g., SKM PowerTools, ETAP, EasyPower) can greatly simplify fault current calculations and TCC curve plotting. However, hand calculations are valid if done correctly.
Professional Engineer (PE) Stamp
Depending on your local regulations and the scope of the project, you might need a licensed PE to review and stamp your calculations and report.
AHJ Approval
Ultimately, the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) has the final say. Discuss your approach with them beforehand to ensure they will accept your proof of passivity.
Derating
You may need to de-rate your breaker based on the ambient temperatures of your breakers.
In summary, address the request with detailed fault current calculations, time-current coordination studies, and clear documentation demonstrating that the upstream breaker clears faults quickly enough to protect the downstream breakers and to ensure the breakers do not trip unnecessarily. Good luck! Flag for review