Mike Dolt Enterprises Logo Mike Dolt Enterprises

Topic: Punching new holes in main breaker panels

User: jeffelectric1992, Location: Chicago IL

Asked on: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 4:42 pm EDT
Answered on: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 4:43 pm EDT

Question: We recently had an inspection on a service upgrade fail in Chicago for a reason I have never had cited before.The Inspector failed the installation because the installer had punched a two inch opening in the back of the new tub for the serviceentrance pipe and didn't use the existing concentric knockouts. The inspector stated that this was a violation of the panels listing.I can find no information from the panel manufacturer that would support the inspectors claim.

This is a frustrating situation. Here's a breakdown of why the inspector might have failed the installation and how to approach it, along with some points to consider

Understanding the Inspector's Rationale

The inspector's reasoning likely stems from a combination of these principles: Panel Listing (UL Listing)

Electrical panels (service entrance panels in particular) are rigorously tested and listed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) or other similar testing agencies. This listing ensures the panel meets specific safety and performance standards. The listing is based on the
entire panel as it was tested and submitted.

Maintaining the Integrity of the Listing

The inspector is arguing that modifying the panel (especially by creating new openings) invalidates the UL listing. The panel wasn't tested with that hole in the back. This is a common, though sometimes debatable, interpretation.

Potential for Compromised Enclosure

Creating a non-standard opening might weaken the enclosure, making it more susceptible to physical damage, water ingress, or other hazards.


Proper Bonding & Grounding

A correctly sized and listed opening is crucial for proper bonding and grounding of the conduit entering the panel. The inspector might be concerned that the punched hole doesn't provide the correct physical connection.

Chicago's Unique Electrical Code

Chicago's electrical code is notoriously stringent and often has specific interpretations that go beyond the national NEC. It's possible there's a local amendment or a long-standing interpretation of the code that the inspector is applying.

Why You May Not Find it in the Manufacturer's Documentation
Negative Constraints

Manufacturers rarely explicitly state what not to do. They focus on how the panel should be installed according to its listing. The assumption is that you'll use the listed knockouts or use listed fitting approved for the particular type of panel for penetrations.

UL Guidelines

UL typically states that any field modifications to a listed product must be evaluated and approved by UL themselves. You aren't going to find a common homeowner or electrician getting that type of modification approved, because it would be expensive and time-consuming.

How to Approach This Situation
1. Respectfully Clarify with the Inspector



Politely ask the inspector for the specific code section (Chicago Electrical Code) that prohibits the practice.
Say something like, "Inspector, I understand your concern. Could you point me to the specific code section in the Chicago Electrical Code that prohibits making that opening in the panel?" This shows you're willing to learn and follow the rules. Ask about acceptable alternatives. "Inspector, if that isn't acceptable, what would you consider a compliant way to bring the service entrance conductor into the panel in this situation?" Take notes and record the inspector's explanation carefully.2. Consult the Chicago Electrical Code

Obtain a copy of the Chicago Electrical Code (it is different from the NEC) and carefully review the sections on service entrance equipment, panel installations, and equipment listings. Pay close attention to any local amendments.3.

Contact the Panel Manufacturer
Get in touch with the technical support department of the electrical panel manufacturer and inquire about your situation. Keep the question neutral. Something like, "We are upgrading a service and the field crew created an opening in the panel that was not one of the original knockouts. I want to know how that affects the UL listing, and the correct way to proceed given the situation".4. Check with the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)

If you're still unsure, contact the City of Chicago's electrical inspection department directly. Speak to a supervisor or senior inspector and ask for their interpretation. Explain the situation objectively and be prepared to provide details.5.

Consider a Correction



If the inspector is correct and there's no compliant workaround, the best course of action may be to replace the panel or have the opening professionally closed and sealed using a method approved by the inspector.
This might involve welding a plate over the hole. Properly Bond

Ensure proper bonding/grounding of the conduit entering the panel. If there is a metal panel enclosure, the connection must be to metal.

Important Considerations
Safety First

Never compromise on electrical safety. If there's any doubt, err on the side of caution and comply with the inspector's requirements.

Documentation

Keep detailed records of all communication with the inspector, the manufacturer, and the AHJ.


Future Prevention

In the future, emphasize to your installers the importance of using existing knockouts or consulting with you (or a supervisor) before making any modifications to electrical equipment.

In summary, while you might not find a direct prohibition in the manufacturer's documentation, the inspector's concern about maintaining the panel's UL listing and the integrity of the enclosure is legitimate. The key is to communicate respectfully with the inspector, understand their reasoning, research the Chicago Electrical Code, and find a compliant solution that ensures safety.
Remember Chicago's code is often more restrictive than the NEC. Good luck! Flag for review

Previous Question Next Question