User: myntz, Location: New Jersey
Asked on: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 2:21 pm EDT
Answered on: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 2:22 pm EDT
Question: Curious to know if anyone had came across where MV substation transformer have both exposed lightning arrestor and HV (35kV) terminals Mounted on top of the transformer. This is exposed to the environment. The incoming HV feeder comes from overhead copper bus-tube with adapter for conductor. I am looking to see the best way run the feeder from the bus-tube to lightning arrester to HV terminal. The distance between each point is pretty short, maybe 22" or so. This mean it will be pretty tough to use Shield MV cable with stress cones given the distance. Has anyone done this with just bare copper (not sure if this is code violation) or know of any insulated but non-shielded 35kV cable for short run like this?The transformer sits inside a locked fence yard with sufficient height.
You've described a fairly common, albeit older, MV transformer configuration. Having the lightning arrestors and HV terminals directly mounted on top of the transformer with connections to open bus/conductor is not unusual, especially in outdoor substations.Here's a breakdown of potential solutions and considerations, focusing on the code (NEC) aspects and best practices
Considerations and Challenges:
Clearances (NEC 110.26, IEEE C2)
Maintaining proper phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground clearances is critical. 22" between points is tight. You must adhere to the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC) and, ideally, consult IEEE C2 (National Electrical Safety Code - NESC) which provides more detailed guidance on clearances for substations. These clearances are voltage-dependent, so 35kV class equipment requires careful attention.
Environmental Exposure
Being outdoors, the connections are exposed to weather, UV, and potential contaminants. Corrosion is a concern.
Safety
The primary reason for shielded cable is safety. In your case, being behind a locked fence provides some safety, but doesn't eliminate the risk of accidental contact (maintenance personnel, etc.).
Mechanical Stress
The conductors must be able to withstand mechanical forces (wind, ice, vibration) and the weight of connections.
Corona
High voltage gradients on sharp points or improperly installed terminations can lead to corona discharge, causing insulation degradation and radio interference.
Possible Solutions
Bare Copper Buswork
Pros
Simplest and potentially most cost-effective. Good current carrying capacity.
Cons
Highest risk of flashover if clearances are not meticulously maintained. Requires careful engineering for mechanical support. NEC compliance will be extremely difficult. The NEC generally requires insulation at these voltage levels unless you can meet the requirements for exposed live parts operating at over 600V (and those requirements are extremely stringent).
Code Issues
NEC 310.15 specifically requires conductors operating at over 600V to be insulated unless specifically permitted otherwise (e.g., in switchgear). The exposed conductors are very likely to violate 110.26 (Working Space and Guarding) and 225 (Outside Branch Circuits and Feeders).
Implementation
If using bare copper, consider: Use heavy-duty copper bar (busbar) for rigidity. Ensure rounded edges to minimize corona. Thoroughly clean and treat the copper to prevent corrosion. Use insulating spacers between phases and to ground. Choose the right material for 35kV service. The busbar design must address expansion and contraction due to temperature variations. Very careful engineering analysis is required to prove compliance with the NEC, IEEE C2, and other applicable standards.2.
Insulated, Non-Shielded Cable (35kV Rated)
Pros
Offers some insulation protection against accidental contact and environmental factors. Easier to route than bare copper.
Cons
Shielding is very desireable for MV and HV system to help contrain the electric field. Non-shielded cable may create issues with leakage current.
Code Issues
Less problematic than bare copper but still subject to NEC scrutiny. You must verify that the cable is rated for the specific application (outdoor, wet location, etc.) and that the clearances meet code. The insulation still has to meet the voltage rating.
Implementation
Select a cable specifically designed for 35kV applications, outdoor exposure, and your operating temperature. Use cable lugs and terminations rated for the cable and voltage. Properly support the cable to prevent stress on the terminations. Use a high grade mastic tape and sealant on the crimped connector to protect the connection. Maintain adequate clearances to grounded objects.3.
Shielded MV Cable with Modified Terminations
Pros
Offers the highest level of safety, reliability, and performance. Minimizes electrical stress on insulation. Reduces the risk of corona and radio interference. Complies better with NEC intent.
Cons
More complex and expensive to install, especially with short runs. Stress cones are bulky.
Implementation
Challenge
You're right; standard stress cones are likely too large for the 22" span.
Solution
Look for manufacturers that offer "short" or "compact" stress cones specifically designed for limited space applications. These are designed to be smaller and easier to install in tight quarters. 3M, ABB, Elastimold, and others make such terminations. Call their technical support. Another possible option is using heat shrink terminations. These can sometimes be a bit more compact. Ensure proper cable grounding (shield grounding) is done according to manufacturer instructions and NEC requirements. Use proper crimping tools for the cable lugs and connectors. Pay meticulous attention to detail during installation to avoid damaging the cable insulation or shield.4.
Prefabricated MV Bus Duct
Pros
Engineered solution, offering excellent reliability and safety. May be easier to install than custom solutions.
Cons
Potentially the most expensive option. May require long lead times. May not be readily available for such short runs.
Implementation
Contact manufacturers of MV bus duct (e.g., Siemens, Eaton, Schneider Electric) to see if they offer a suitable solution. Ensure the bus duct is rated for your voltage, current, and environmental conditions.
Recommendations
Consult with a qualified electrical engineer with experience in substation design. They can perform a thorough engineering analysis, select the appropriate solution, and ensure compliance with all applicable codes and standards. This is essential for safety and liability reasons.2. Prioritize Safety
Shielded cable, even with short terminations, offers the best level of safety and long-term reliability.3.
Consider Long-Term Costs
While bare copper might be cheaper initially, the potential for failure, increased maintenance, and liability risks can far outweigh the initial savings.4.
Documentation
Meticulously document all design decisions, materials used, and installation procedures. This is crucial for future maintenance and troubleshooting.5.
Contact Manufacturers
Talk to the technical support teams of cable, termination, and bus duct manufacturers. They can provide valuable guidance and recommendations for your specific application.
In Summary:
While bare copper might seem like a simple solution, it is likely to violate code, poses significant safety risks, and is generally not recommended. Exploring compact stress cones for shielded cable is the best starting point. A qualified engineer is vital for this project. Good luck! Flag for review