User: DooWop, Location: Corrales NM
Asked on: Sunday, May 11, 2025 at 5:40 pm EDT
Answered on: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at 8:23 pm EDT
Question: I read in the paper the government wants to eliminate the Energy Star program.Will this mean hvac and appliances will revert to the designs before the program beganor will something be salvaged?I also worry a bit about OSHA on the cutting block as I've seen much safer construction sites over the last 50 years with OSHA.Safety used to be a hard sell for many guys doing things their way for so long. But over time I've even heard guyson crews changing minds and even making comments to others about being safe.I worry if safety will still be much thought of if OSHA's gone or hobbled.Insurance companies liked OSHA. OSHA saved them $$ and made construction safer IMO.
It's understandable to be concerned about potential changes to programs like Energy Star and OSHA. Let's break down the likely scenarios
Energy Star:
Reverting to pre-Energy Star designs is unlikely. The Energy Star program has had a significant impact on the market, and manufacturers have invested heavily in developing energy-efficient technologies. Even without the Energy Star label, market demand for efficient appliances and HVAC systems is likely to persist, driven by consumer desire for lower energy bills and, in some regions, regulations mandating certain efficiency standards. States may step in
Some states have their own efficiency standards and incentive programs. If the federal Energy Star program were eliminated or weakened, these state-level initiatives could become more prominent, partially filling the gap.
Industry self-regulation
Without Energy Star, industry groups might create their own certification programs to differentiate energy-efficient products. However, the credibility and impact of these programs would depend on their stringency and consumer recognition.
Less transparency for consumers
One of the biggest benefits of Energy Star is that it provided a standardized, easily recognizable benchmark for energy efficiency. Without it, consumers might find it more difficult to compare products and make informed decisions.
OSHA
Safety standards already in place
Even if OSHA were significantly weakened or eliminated, many existing safety regulations would likely remain in place. Some of these are state-level regulations or are embedded in building codes.
Insurance liability
As you noted, insurance companies have a strong incentive to promote workplace safety. They may increase premiums for companies with poor safety records, which would encourage employers to maintain safety standards even without OSHA oversight.
Corporate social responsibility
Many companies have embraced safety as part of their corporate culture and social responsibility initiatives. They may continue to prioritize safety even if regulations are relaxed.
Employee empowerment
If employees are empowered to speak up about safety concerns and refuse to work in unsafe conditions, this can act as a powerful deterrent to unsafe practices.
Erosion of standards
Your concerns are valid. The loss of OSHA oversight could lead to a gradual erosion of safety standards, particularly in smaller companies or industries with historically poor safety records. Without consistent enforcement, some employers may cut corners to save money, potentially leading to more accidents and injuries. The safety-conscious attitudes you've observed developing in the construction industry could diminish if there's no longer a strong regulatory push.
Data collection hampered
OSHA plays a crucial role in collecting data on workplace injuries and fatalities. Without this data, it would be more difficult to identify trends and target interventions to prevent accidents.
In Conclusion:
While the complete reversal to pre-program conditions is unlikely for either scenario, the dismantling or significant weakening of either Energy Star or OSHA would likely have negative consequences. For Energy Star, it might lead to less consumer awareness and potentially slower progress on energy efficiency. For OSHA, it could lead to a decline in workplace safety and an increase in accidents and injuries, especially where insurance premiums are less expensive than implementing safety procedures.Keep in mind that the actual outcome will depend on a variety of factors, including the specific details of any policy changes, the response from states and industry, and the attitudes of employers and employees. Flag for review