You're right to question the POCO rep. Based on the document you provided, the rep's assertion about the railing likely isn't accurate. Here's a breakdown of why, and how to approach the meeting with the supervisor

Why the POCO Rep is likely incorrect (based on the provided document):
"Wall" Definition

You are correct. The document refers to clearances from walls or adjacent corner walls. A railing, protective post, or barrier is not a wall. Walls provide structural enclosure to the house, and railings do not.

Working Space Requirements

The POCO document emphasizes the 30" wide, 36" deep, and 80" high working space. As long as that space is clear in front of the meter, and the meter is accessible without special means, you're likely in compliance.

Arguments to make in the meeting with the POCO Supervisor


Clarify "Wall" Definition

Start by politely asking the supervisor to define "wall" as it pertains to the clearance requirements. Emphasize that the railing is not a structural or enclosure component of the building. Point out that the document consistently uses "wall" in reference to the building structure itself.2.

Working Space Compliance

Clearly state that the required 30" wide, 36" deep, and 80" high working space in front of the meter is unobstructed. Show them the image of the installation again. It's clear from the picture that the 30x36x80 space is there and code-compliant.3.

Alternative Protection Analogy

Use the "protective post/barrier" analogy. Ask if they would require the same 18" clearance if you had installed a single, sturdy post in the same location as the railing. If they say no (which is likely), highlight the inconsistency of treating the railing differently.4.

Safety vs. Practicality

Emphasize that your installation prioritizes safety. The railing itself could be considered a safety barrier in some ways (preventing someone from accidentally bumping into the meter). Explain the difficulty and expense of moving the meter fitting. Moving a 400A underground service is a significant undertaking.5.

Request a Written Clarification

After the discussion, politely request a written clarification of the POCO's interpretation of the clearance requirements in your specific situation. This provides you with a formal record.

How to Approach the Meeting



Be Respectful

Even if you disagree, maintain a polite and respectful tone throughout the meeting. Anger will not help your case.

Be Prepared

Bring a printed copy of the POCO document, the photo of your installation, and a sketch illustrating the dimensions.

Be Clear

State your case concisely and logically.

Listen Actively

Pay attention to the supervisor's responses and address their concerns directly.

Document Everything

Take notes during the meeting, including the names of everyone present and the key points discussed.

Important Considerations



Local Codes

While the POCO document is your primary reference, also check your local city or county electrical codes. Sometimes, local jurisdictions have stricter requirements than the utility.

Consult a Licensed Electrician

If the POCO remains insistent, consider getting a written opinion from a licensed and respected electrician in your area. The electrician can attest to the code compliance of your installation and may be able to influence the POCO's decision.

Escalation

If the meeting with the supervisor is unsuccessful, ask about the POCO's escalation process. There may be a higher-level authority you can appeal to.

In summary, you have a strong argument based on the provided documentation. By being prepared, respectful, and clear in your communication, you have a good chance of resolving this issue without having to move the meter fitting. Flag for review